Yesterday was the 3rd batch of PAP Candidates being introduced by Minister Without Portfolio and one of them revealed was the youngest candidate ever field by the PAP. She's 27 Years old Ms Tin Pei Ling and during 28 March Channel 5 News, she mentioned that she will use "
New Media" such as Social Networking Sites "
to give voice to people (just to share good ideas?)"
(All screen grabs from MediaCorp Channel 5)
Apparently, blogging, Facebook etc are not new, but pretty new to PAP and was wondering why she mentioned these are
New Media?
Later on, she "declared war" (IMO) that the Singaporean Net activities are
dominated by "
Anti Establishment" elements.
IMO, she's another PAP Parrot, parroting her PAP Masters' Policies and Anti-Singaporeans Policies such as Immigration, Refusal of setting minimum wages for low income workers.
Why use Social Media Sites when she is suppose to reflect her (if she is even elected or best walked over) constituents' concerns and bring them up to the parliament?
Is she attempting another battery jump start of defunct "PAP" P65 Blog when
Vikram Nair had failed? Perhaps she can start P70 or P80 Online Forums to engage those Anti Establishment sites or people.
She or her PAP Masters had failed to realised that Anti-Establishment sites or Blogs such as mine are all free agents; others or myself does not report to the White Ivory Tower with a Red Lighting. For myself, I write about my thoughts resulted from PAP's Anti-Singaporeans Policies to increase GDP and increase their Annual Salaries.
I was wondering who was the P65 site owner and using whois; it belonged to
Vikram Nair, a Young PAP Member who tried to masquerade himself as a P65 Blogger and in fact he was the owner.
Mask exposed and Site had to be trashed because its not that non Partisan! How stupid!
Via
(All screen grabs from MediaCorp Channel 5)
Apparently, blogging, Facebook etc are not new, but pretty new to PAP and was wondering why she mentioned these are New Media?
Later on, she "declared war" (IMO) that the Singaporean Net activities are dominated by "Anti Establishment" elements.
IMO, she's another PAP Parrot, parroting her PAP Masters' Policies and Anti-Singaporeans Policies such as Immigration, Refusal of setting minimum wages for low income workers.
Why use Social Media Sites when she is suppose to reflect her (if she is even elected or best walked over) constituents' concerns and bring them up to the parliament?
Is she attempting another battery jump start of defunct "PAP" P65 Blog when Vikram Nair had failed? Perhaps she can start P70 or P80 Online Forums to engage those Anti Establishment sites or people.
She or her PAP Masters had failed to realised that Anti-Establishment sites or Blogs such as mine are all free agents; others or myself does not report to the White Ivory Tower with a Red Lighting. For myself, I write about my thoughts resulted from PAP's Anti-Singaporeans Policies to increase GDP and increase their Annual Salaries.
I was wondering who was the P65 site owner and using whois; it belonged to Vikram Nair, a Young PAP Member who tried to masquerade himself as a P65 Blogger and in fact he was the owner.
Mask exposed and Site had to be trashed because its not that non Partisan! How stupid!
Via
